Quick Analysis
Benelli TRK 502
32.0 pts
Unweighted: 19 advantages
EnginePerformanceDimensionsBrakesTyresFeaturesOther
OLA Roadster X+
7.5 pts
Unweighted: 11 advantages
EnginePerformanceDimensionsBrakesTyresFeaturesOther
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
Engine Specifications |
||
| Cooling System | Liquid-cooled | — |
| Displacement | 500 | — |
| Engine Type | 2-cylinder/4-stroke/8-valve | — |
| Power | 35kW at 8500 r/min | 11 kw |
| Torque | 46N·m/6000 r/min | 58 Nm |
Performance & Efficiency |
||
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 l | — |
| Mileage | 25 kmpl | — |
Dimensions & Weight |
||
| Kerb Weight | 210 kg | 131.4 |
| Seat Height | 835mm | 777 mm |
Brakes & Suspension |
||
| ABS | Dual Channel | — |
| Front Brake | Disc Front 320 mm Caliper - Front 4 Piston | Disc Brake and Brake by Wire |
| Front Suspension | USD Telescopic Forks | Telescopic Fork |
| Rear Brake | Disc Rear 260 mm Caliper - Rear 1 Piston | Drum |
| Rear Suspension | Hydraulic Monoshock (Rebound & Preload adjustable) | Twin Shock Absorber |
Tyres & Wheels |
||
| Front Tyre | 120/70 ZR17 | 80/100 - 18 |
| Rear Tyre | 160/60 ZR17 | 110/80 - 17 |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Wheel Type | Alloy | Alloy |
Features & Technology |
||
| Headlight | — | LED |
Other Specifications |
||
| 0–40 km/h (s) | — | 2.7 |
| Battery Capacity (kWh) | — | 9.1 |
| Bike Image 1 | https://motoautiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/trk502white.webp | https://motoautiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/roadsterxplusstellarblue.webp |
| Bike Image 2 | — | https://motoautiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/roadsterxpluspinegreen.webp |
| Bike Image 3 | — | https://motoautiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/roadsterxplusceramicwhite.webp |
| Charger Output Power (kW) | — | 11 |
| Cluster | — | Digital |
| Color Options | — | Ceramic White|#fafbfc Metallic Black|#4f4f4f Pine Green|#688f86 Industrial Silver|#969696 Stellar Blue|#2a8bbf |
| Cons | Its heavy weight becomes noticeable in traffic, tight turns, and situations where quick direction changes are needed. While the suspension works well for moderate rough roads, very broken terrain can feel harsh or less controlled compared to more off-road-focused bikes. Maintenance and spare parts may cost more than typical mid-segment bikes, making long-term ownership slightly expensive. The power-to-weight ratio isn’t the strongest, so riders expecting a very punchy performance may find it a bit slow when accelerating hard. It lacks some modern electronic features that newer competitors now offer, which may disappoint riders looking for advanced tech and connectivity. | Real-world range and performance will likely be lower than claimed — heavy use, frequent stops, speed variations, and load (pillion, luggage) will eat into efficiency. Charging infrastructure & time: if you don’t have easy access to a charger (or fast charger), long-range EVs can become inconvenient — charging from home or available points may not always be smooth. Ride/comfort trade-offs: compared to a petrol bike or premium EV bike, suspension, build or ergonomics may feel basic — this might show on rough roads or during long rides. Limited storage/practical baggage space compared with scooters — less convenient if you often need to carry luggage or do frequent errands. Uncertainty over long-term maintenance/battery life: with any new EV bike, battery degradation over years and real-world wear can be a concern — long-term durability isn’t yet proven. |
| Detailed Overview | You swing a leg over the TRK 502 and you’re immediately aware that this is meant to be more than a city commuter; there’s a sense of presence, of readiness for longer roads. Under the tank sits a 500 cc, liquid-cooled, parallel-twin engine, running a DOHC layout with 8 valves. The bore and stroke (69 × 66.8 mm) and a compression ratio of 11.5:1 tell you that this engine is tuned for a healthy balance — it’s neither peaky and fragile, nor a torquey grinder. What you get instead is a smooth, flexible powerplant that builds revs steadily, giving enough grunt without being nervous or rough. At its peak, it delivers about 46.8-47.5 horsepower at 8,500 rpm and 46 Newton-metres of torque at around 6,000 rpm. That output, in plain riding, doesn’t mean blazing superbike sprints. It means confidence: enough urge to overtake on the highway, enough midrange torque for loaded touring or two-up rides, and smooth throttle response for city or mixed-road use. The 6-speed gearbox with chain final drive feels just right — shifts are predictable and the clutch (wet multi-plate / slipper clutch depending on region) handles starts and slow manoeuvres without fuss. Because this is meant for touring and everyday versatility, the chassis and suspension are built accordingly. A steel trellis frame acts as the backbone — sturdy enough to keep the bike stable at speed, yet with a bit of compliance to soak up normal road irregularities. Up front, there’s an upside-down telescopic fork (about 50 mm) with around 140 mm travel; at the rear a preload- and rebound-adjustable mono-shock with around 45 mm travel. What that gives on road is a setup that doesn’t punish you over bad surfaces but remains planted: potholes, imperfect tarmac or rough stretches are dealt with gracefully, while the bike stays composed even when you ask for speed or load it up with luggage and pillion. Physically the TRK 502 is substantial — long and purposeful. Its overall length is about 2200–2220 mm, width around 915 mm, and height roughly 1450 mm (slightly more depending on variant). The wheelbase of 1505 mm gives it stable tracking on highways and at speed, but that length and mass mean low-speed manoeuvres require some care — U-turns, tight corners, or dense traffic will need respect and a bit of strength. The seat height — roughly 800-835 mm depending on model/market — places you in a commanding riding posture: good for visibility and control, but may feel tall for shorter riders. Ground clearance around 190 mm means you’re also not too worried about speed-bumps or rough rural surfaces. When it comes to stopping and safety, TRK 502 doesn’t leave much to complaint. Twin 320 mm discs up front (with 4-piston calipers) and a 260 mm disc at the rear — both with dual-channel ABS — give you solid braking power and modulation. In everyday traffic or loaded touring, you get confident, progressive braking rather than abrupt grabs or fade, which is exactly what you want when you’re carrying luggage or a pillion. Fuel-wise, the 20-litre tank (with a bit of reserve) gives a decent riding range. Fill up and you can reasonably expect to tackle long rides or highway runs without constant fuel stops — an important detail if you plan to use this bike for touring or inter-city travel. Combined with the engine’s fuel injection and tuning, the balance between performance and range is well-struck. On the feature front, the TRK 502 comes decently equipped for its class. The instrument console mixes analogue and digital readouts (tachometer + digital speedo/fuel/odometer/trip) — enough to give you all the essential info clearly without overcomplicating the dashboard. Lighting, electrics and ergonomics are oriented toward usability: the riding position is upright, comfortable for long hours; footpegs and rider triangle are such that you don’t feel cramped even after a few hours of cruise. For everyday commuting, that means less fatigue; for touring, it means more hours in the saddle without strain. When you take it out on the open road — open highway, winding roads, rolling hills — the TRK 502 reveals what it is built for: stability, comfort, and controlled performance. It doesn’t feel underpowered even when carrying luggage or with a pillion; the twin’s smooth torque curve helps you manage traffic or overtakes with ease. On rough or uneven roads, the suspension soaks up the imperfections, and the frame feels secure. The overall setup makes it a comfortable, confident companion for trips that are more than just short city commutes. But there are trade-offs. Because the bike is fairly heavy and long, jockeying through tight city traffic or congested lanes means you’ll notice the bulk — quick zigzags or tight U-turns are not the bike’s forte. Seat height and weight can be challenging for shorter riders or those new to big bikes. The power-to-weight ratio is modest, so while it’s confident for touring or leisure riding, it doesn’t give the “sportbike thrill.” If you push it hard — say, frequent hard acceleration with two-up + luggage — you may find that intense use exposes the limits of a 500 cc twin configured for balance, not brute power. Overall, the TRK 502 feels like what you’d expect from a middleweight touring-oriented motorcycle — not a race-bred machine, not a lightweight commuter, but a capable all-rounder that lets you ride relaxed yet with enough substance. It’s ideal for those who want a single bike to handle everything: daily commuting when needed, weekend adventures, city-to-city travel, even occasional touring with a pillion and luggage, all without demanding sport bike instinct or compromising comfort. | The Ola Roadster X+ feels like a serious attempt to marry modern electric-bike practicality with real-world performance — and on paper, it does enough to make you sit up and take notice. Under its sleek bodywork lies an 11 kW mid-drive electric motor that delivers a quick, smooth surge of power the moment you twist the throttle. That punch, combined with the lighter electric driveline and chain drive, gives the bike enough zest to tackle city traffic smartly or even stretch its legs on open roads. On the top-end 9.1 kWh variant, the claimed 0-to-40 km/h time is just 2.7 seconds and top speed around 125 km/h — not sport-bike blistering, but more than adequate for busy Indian roads and the occasional highway run. Where Roadster X+ really tries to shine is in the battery-and-range equation. If you pick the smaller 4.5 kWh pack, you get a claimed range around 252 km — handy for daily commuting and regular errands. But go for the large 9.1 kWh battery, and the claimed “IDC” range jumps to a striking 501 km on a charge. That number (which assumes ideal conditions) suggests the bike could cover long stretches between charges, reducing range anxiety and making it more practical for longer commutes or sporadic weekend rides. Naturally, real-world range will vary based on speed, load, terrain and throttle usage — but the generous battery gives a buffer that many electric two-wheelers don’t. Comfort and rideability appear to have been given thoughtful consideration. The bike rides on a conventional telescopic front fork and twin-shock rear suspension, built on a sturdy double-cradle steel frame. For daily city traffic, mixed-speed roads, potholes and uneven patches — common across Indian towns — this setup should deliver a stable, predictable ride. The kerb weight and geometry are such that maneuvering through congested lanes, filtering traffic or parking in narrow spots won’t feel overly burdensome. Ground clearance and tyre-/wheel specs also help it adapt to typical road conditions without undermining stability. Rider convenience and modern-bike niceties haven’t been ignored. Roadster X+ gets a 4.3-inch full-colour digital display that runs on the manufacturer’s proprietary OS, bringing in features like ride modes (Eco, Normal, Sport), reverse assist (handy in tight parking), cruise-control, tyre-pressure alerts, geo/time-fencing, energy-insights, OTA updates, and more. LED lighting, tubeless alloy wheels, digital instrumentation — they give the bike a contemporary feel, helping it stand out versus legacy petrol bikes and some other EV two-wheelers. The under-seat storage and ergonomics are more utility-focused than sporty, which matches the bike’s practical-commuter intent. Price-wise, Roadster X+ positions itself as a premium-ish but still attainable EV bike. Compared to traditional petrol motorcycles of similar displacement or other EV rivals, the combination of performance, battery capacity, and tech makes it appealing especially for someone looking to switch to electric without compromising too much on usability. The high-end 9.1 kWh variant, with its long-range claim and balanced performance, seems aimed at riders who want an EV that feels closer to a regular bike than a low-speed city scooter. That said, nothing electric or new is completely “issue-free.” Real-world conditions — especially heavy traffic, frequent start-stops, potholes, mixed roads — will likely reduce the ideal range and may strain battery & motor more than a stable test loop. Charging convenience becomes a factor if you lack home charging or nearby chargers; charging time for the big battery on AC still takes hours, which means planning is needed before long rides. And while the suspension/ride setup is practical, it’s unlikely to deliver plush comfort on badly pocked rural roads. In essence, Ola Roadster X+ isn’t about flashy superbike performance or luxury-bike refinement. It aims to be a balanced, thoughtful electric motorcycle for modern Indian commuting: powerful enough to keep traffic flowing, roomy enough in battery to cut charging woes, simple and robust for everyday use, and smart enough with tech features to feel like a 2025-era ride. For someone in a city or well-connected semi-urban area who wants to step into electric mobility without sacrificing too much on real-world ride, the X+ could very well hit a sweet spot. |
| Expert Review | MotoAutiv Team | Ola Roadster X+ is loved for its sporty design, impressive range, and value for money, but has frequent frustration reported from users due to charging malfunctions, software glitches, and poor after-sales service support, 3, MotoAutiv Team |
| FAQ (Manual Override) | Q: What engine does the TRK 502 use? A: It uses a 500 cc, liquid-cooled, parallel-twin DOHC engine with 8 valves. Q: What is the power and torque output? A: The engine puts out about 47.5 PS at 8,500 rpm and delivers around 46 Nm of torque at 6,000 rpm. Q: What kind of transmission does it have? A: It comes with a 6-speed manual gearbox and a chain final drive. Q: What is the fuel tank capacity? A: The fuel tank capacity is 20 litres. Q: What is the seat height and ground clearance? A: The seat height is roughly 800–835 mm (depending on variant/market), and ground clearance is about 190 mm. Q: What is the kerb (or wet) weight of the bike? A: The bike weighs around 228–235 kg (depending on specification and additional gear/load). Q: What are the brakes and wheels/tyres setup? A: Up front there are twin 320 mm disc brakes with 4-piston calipers; at the rear a 260 mm disc. Both front and rear tyres sit on 17-inch alloy wheels, with tubeless tyres. Dual-channel ABS comes standard. Q: What is the claimed mileage / fuel efficiency? A: Mileage typically ranges around 30–34 km per litre (city and highway use). Q: What kind of suspension does it have? A: It uses a 50 mm upside-down (USD) telescopic front fork (about 140 mm travel) and a rear mono-shock with preload adjustability and around 45 mm rear suspension travel. Q: What kind of instrumentation and features does it offer? A: The instrument console combines analogue (tachometer) and digital displays (speedometer, fuel gauge, trip meter, etc.). It includes electric start, digital fuel gauge, trip meter, passenger footrests, and typical adventure-tourer ergonomics. Q: What is its top speed / performance potential? A: The top speed is around 160–165 km/h, and it can do 0–100 km/h in approximately 7.5–8 seconds depending on load and conditions. | Q: What battery options are available for Roadster X+? A: Roadster X+ is offered with a 4.5 kWh battery pack and a 9.1 kWh battery pack. Q: What is the claimed range on a full charge? A: The 4.5 kWh variant is claimed to give up to 252 km per charge; the 9.1 kWh variant claims up to 501 km per charge. Q: What motor power does Roadster X+ have? A: The Roadster X+ uses an 11 kW mid-drive motor. Q: What is the top speed of Roadster X+? A: The top speed is claimed to be 125 km/h. Q: How quick is the acceleration (0–40 km/h)? A: Roadster X+ can sprint from 0 to 40 km/h in approximately 2.7 seconds. Q: What kind of braking and wheels does it have? A: It has a front disc brake, a rear drum brake, and uses tubeless tyres with alloy wheels. Q: What suspension and frame setup does Roadster X+ use? A: It uses a double-cradle steel frame, telescopic front forks, and twin-shock adjustable rear suspension. Q: What sort of display and electronic features does it come with? A: It has a 4.3-inch colour LCD display and supports multiple ride modes (Eco, Normal, Sport), plus features like regenerative braking, reverse assist, and other smart-bike features. Q: What is the charging time for Roadster X+? A: The 9.1 kWh battery variant takes around 8 hours for full charge (0–80% charging time as per official spec sheet). Q: What is the curb weight and seat height (for 9.1 kWh variant)? A: The kerb weight is listed at ~148.3 kg and the seat height is about 777 mm. |
| Fuel System | — | Electric |
| Price Variants | | 662000 | 9.1 kWh|189999 4.5 kWh|129999 |
| Pros | The TRK 502 is built for long rides, offering a relaxed riding position and a comfortable seat that help you stay fresh even after hours on the highway. Its suspension and chassis balance make it stable on rough patches, allowing it to handle mixed road conditions without feeling nervous. For its price, the bike comes loaded with practical touring features like hand guards, a large windscreen, good ergonomics, and a solid, confidence-inspiring build. The bike feels substantial on the road — its size and weight give it a strong presence, making it feel like a true adventure-tourer. The engine is smooth and predictable, making it friendly for newer riders while still offering enough power for everyday commuting and long-distance travel. | Strong performance: the 11 kW motor gives brisk acceleration and top-end speed, making the ride feel lively even with a full load. Good range (especially on 9.1 kWh version): the large battery lets you cover long distances between charges — useful for daily commuting and occasional longer rides. Modern features & electronics: digital display, ride modes, smart-bike style features (like regen braking, possibly app connectivity and convenience features, depending on variant) make it feel more up-to-date than a basic commuter bike. Practical for city + occasional highway: with decent speed and torque, it works well in urban traffic, but can also handle open roads when needed, giving flexibility. Good choice for EV-minded buyers: being electric, operating costs (fuel, oil, frequent maintenance) are lower than a petrol bike, which may save money over time. |
| Range (Claimed, km) | — | 501 |
| Starter | Electric | — |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
